?> The Benefits of an Offer to Settle | Andriessen & Associates
January 2018
M T W T F S S
« Dec    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031  
Recent Tweets
  • Have a great weekend - we'll see you back here Monday. 2 days
  • A good contract is written in plain English - don't be fooled by complicated words - if you don't understand it, do not sign it. 2 days
  • Certain types of contracts are complicated - leases, tenancy agreements, licensing agreements to name a few. Get l… https://t.co/qGtuwmBXsI 2 days
  • Worried that the signor of a contract on behalf of a company may not have authority to do so? Ontario's Indoor Man… https://t.co/lZ6rMxsmj6 3 days
  • In case you need to sue, be sure your agreement says you are entitled to your actual legal fees. If you don't, the… https://t.co/3YCnK5jExu 3 days
  • Yes, a verbal agreement is enforceable, however, it's harder to prove and creates uncertainty. Handshakes are best… https://t.co/PXmFk5p54f 4 days
  • A good written agreement will note that it cannot be changed, except by agreement, in writing, by all parties to the agreement. 4 days
  • Before you sign a contract, know who you are dealing with: are they an incorporation, a partnership or an individua… https://t.co/hxoCqtA0fJ 5 days
  • This week on the Blog our Law Clerk Christine Allan talks about Company Handbooks. https://t.co/gZYoyYRHLV 5 days
  • If you are dealing with a business outside of Ontario, make sure you understand if Ontario law applies and if you m… https://t.co/omVfbG7AWb 5 days

I was recently successful in a Small Claims law suit where our client was sued for alleged damages to a vehicle the plaintiff claimed were caused by our client.

It was obvious after reviewing the Plaintiff’s Claim that the plaintiff had no reason to sue our client. The Deputy Judge at the Settlement Conference had a hard time understanding what the plaintiff’s damages were. We were also confused, and so was the plaintiff! (Helpful hint: if you don’t understand what your paralegal or lawyer has drafted, ask them before they sue on your behalf.)

After the Settlement Conference, we served an Offer to Settle for a nominal amount in an attempt to avoid going to Trial. The nominal amount was based upon our Defence and the Deputy Judge’s thoughts at the Settlement Conference. More importantly, the Offer was served because of the cost consequences for the failure to accept an Offer that is better than the end result.

The Small Claims Court Rules state that if an Offer to Settle is not accepted, but was served before the Trial date, and does not expire before the start of the Trial, the successful party is be entitled to costs that are double the amount that would normally be awarded.
In our case, the claim was in the amount of $25,000.00. The maximum a successful party would be entitled to for representation is 15%, being $3,750.00. With disbursements, our client’s costs ended up being approximately $4,300.00.

During my submissions, I requested that amount, and because our Offer was not accepted and was better than the result (for us at least), I requested double, around $8,600.00.

When the Deputy Judge asked for submissions from the plaintiff’s paralegal representatives (there were two) as to what I was requesting, they asked the Court for leniency. They claimed that the stress caused to their client was worth the Court being lenient when ordering costs against them. As the Court had already found that our client was not responsible for that stress, their request was denied. Our client ended up with a cost order of $7,900.00. Our client was very pleased with this result.

As litigation is never guaranteed, it is always important to consider serving an Offer to Settle, whether you are the plaintiff or defendant, because it may help you in the end, whether it is you paying less in costs if your offer was better than the result, or you getting double costs if you are successful.

Murray S. Brown, Paralegal
mbrown@andriessen.ca